Mesorat%20hashas for Keritot 32:26

אמר רב חסדא

Rab Hisda said:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Rab Hisda differs from Abaye and Rabbah in that he maintains that in the end R. Akiba decided that different Sabbath days were comparable to different objects. The third clause of the quoted Mishnah, which seemingly contradicts him in that it does not state that the transgressor is also liable for each Sabbath, is indeed interpreted by him as implying that there is liability for each Sabbath.');">¹³</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Keritot 32:26. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.